I'm not entirely opposed to the idea... but am curious for some
example
functions. :) -sc
XML::Parser.register_error_handler could be implemented in ruby.
ruby_xml_attr_not_type_name() could be implemented in ruby.
All of the rb_define_consts in ruby_xml_node.c
ruby_xml_node_set_xpath_get() in ruby_xml_node_set.c
Thats all I can remember for now! haha!
I haven't read through all of the code, but I'm just guessing there
are more things....
Hrm, alright.
If the C version has bugs and someone (i.e. you) submits a bug free
version that's pure ruby, I think it'd get committed if fixing the C
version takes more than a few minutes. From a speed and memory
perspective, I'd err on the side of keeping things in C (libxml !=
REXML), but since most all of the heavy lifting is happening in C
anyway, it doesn't take much to convince that it'd belong in ruby if
there's a bug.
Said differently, let sleeping dogs lie and don't waste effort unless
effort needs to be expended to fix something... patches welcome. *grin*
How's that? -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
