On Jul 17, 11:08 am, Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's a gem related question, IMHO, but I like that concept best, to > be honest. > > require 'libxml' > require 'xml'
Great. That'll work for me too. > I think LibXML::XML::* is rather redundant and a waste of keystrokes, > however, and that it should be LibXML::* and XML::*. $0.02. -sc Shouldn't need to type all those keystrokes. 99%+ of time you're going to include LibXML into either the toplevel or one's own module. T. _______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
