node = XML::Node.new('foo') << XML::Node.new('bar') << "bars contents"puts node.parent.parent <foo> <bar>bars contents</bar> <foo>
FYI - one downside of returning the appended object as opposed to self is that the variable node above is the "bar contents" node. Thus you have to write:
puts node.parent.parent. I find that surprising. It would be nice if node was the top node.Thus in the example it would be nice for << to return the child object in some cases and self in others. Sigh.
Anyone see a way of getting the best of both worlds? Charlie
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
