This is likely a PEBKAC issue rather than a bug. I hope I'm submitting to the right list.I'm getting different validation results from libxml in Ruby than I am from a command-line tool (xmllint). I'm using a schema definition from ASTM to validate the output, for what it cost me the schema should be correct. I'm using libxml 0.9.4. I expect a failure, since I haven't added a required node yet (Patient), but I'm trying to reconcile the discrepancy between xmllint and libxml.
Yeah, that sure is interesting. My first thought is if libxml-ruby is using the same version of libmxl that xmllint is using? Is this on Windows, Linux, OS X or some other OS?
Is this a usage error on my part? Am I misusing libxml or is the xml incorrect? If this is a bug, has it been patched? If not, what information can I provide to help get it fixed?
I see the xml you are validating, but can you provide the schema? Mind submitting a bug report at ruby forge?
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?group_id=494 Charlie
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
