Charlie Savage wrote:
The comment says the functions were added to libxml in 2.6.27 but the
code is included for all versions <= 2.6.27 so if you happen to have
exactly 2.6.27 on your system then you get a double definition.
Yup, should be < not <=. I take it you are using 2.6.27?
Well one of our machines was, yes. That seems to be the latest version
in Etch.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
