> -----Original Message----- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Christopher Sean Morrison > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 2:17 PM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: OSI equivalent > > I was afraid of that... and so is our Legal department :(. We want to > issue good general guidance to everyone in our workforce, > but at the moment that appears to be 'go talk with Legal'. > > As for the image by Dr. Wheeler, it doesn't seem to have come through; > can you try resending it? > > > > It was the blue diagram from here: > Caution-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility#Compatibility_of_FOSS_licenses > < > Caution-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility#Compatibility_of_FOSS_licenses > > > > That Wikipedia page in general (and the sources it cites) is probably your > best overall resource. > > As for receiving the image, DoD Outlook is configured to block images, > attachments, and formatting by default for “Non-DoD Source” > mail. You have to right-click a notification at the top of the message to > display blocked content: > > Caution-https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Block-or-unblock-automatic-picture-downloads-in-email-messages-15e08854-6808- > 49b1-9a0a-50b81f2d617a < > Caution-https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Block-or-unblock-automatic-picture-downloads-in-email- > messages-15e08854-6808-49b1-9a0a-50b81f2d617a >
Thank you for the URL, that worked. And I've seen that diagram before, but it doesn't give enough information about full compatibility between licenses. The web page is better though, and the FSF page seems to be the best currently available. Thanks, Cem Karan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
