Hi Roger, Thanks for creating a specific hypothetical.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 10:56 PM Roger Fujii <r...@lookhere.com> wrote: > > *So, let's concoct an example. I have an authentication db which has > username/passwords. I have another separate db that has all sorts of data > on the username. To get a username/password, the user submits a request to > staff, the staff uses a unmodified CAL licensed standalone program that > populates the username/password in the authentication db, and the user gets > the authentication info texted/IMed/emailed to them. Since this is a > concocted example, I'll say that this standalone program is the only CAL > licensed part in the system. * > Where this analysis fails is that all the conditions in section 4 only apply to a Recipient. (See top of section 4). Under this hypothetical, there is no applicable Recipient relative to whom the conditions apply, so there are no resulting obligations. Thanks, Van
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
