VanL dixit: >What would everyone here think of the following exception to the CAL's >requirement to provide source code:
It might address the topic, but I have a really hard time wrapping my head around all the restrictions and terms used. I’d like to argue in favour of a general grace period before releasing the source, but I can see why you’d not want that. I can’t do the mental exercises necessary to think about less complex/restrictive conditions for that clause, though. Think from the perspective of a user of your software… perhaps they might not actively participate in the coordinated disclosure (merely get the embargoed patch from someone who does, which incidentally must also be possible) or something. Similar for the others. bye, //mirabilos -- 21:12⎜<Vutral> sogar bei opensolaris haben die von der community so ziemlich jeden mist eingebaut │ man sollte unices nich so machen das desktopuser zuviel intresse kriegen │ das macht die code base kaputt 21:13⎜<Vutral:#MirBSD> linux war früher auch mal besser :D _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
