Thorsten Glaser wrote on Monday, October 7, 2019 11:22 AM: 
> Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss dixit:
> 
> >If it were to be done seriously, then a great deal more thought would
> >need to go into it. In one of the messages I sent out (see
> 
> What I’m doing at $dayjob (which is involved in Java™ mostly) is to, at build 
> time, do…
> <<SNIP>>

Sounds like we have a volunteer to lead this effort! ;-)

OK, all joking aside, I'm going to change the subject line, so others can 
filter this conversation out, as it is definitely not about "Discussion: AGPL 
and Open Source Definition conflict", and it is unkind to anyone using a search 
engine in the future to try to find this thread from the subject.

Thanks,
Cem Karan
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
  • Re: [License-di... Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
    • Re: [Licen... Bruce Perens via License-discuss
      • Re: [L... Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
        • Re... Bruce Perens via License-discuss
          • ... Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss
        • Re... Thorsten Glaser
          • ... Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY CCDC ARL (USA) via License-discuss

Reply via email to