Moving to license-discuss.
Pam
Chair, License Committee
Open Source Initiative
On 1/4/20 4:21 PM, Keith Zubot-Gephart wrote:
On Sat Jan 4 03:18:16 UTC 2020 VanL <van.lindberg at gmail.com> wrote:
You are right, copyleft-next is engaging in a public drafting process, and
has not submitted the license to any authority. On the other hand, it also
has a big "DO NOT USE AS A LICENSE" written across the top of the draft, so
it is hard to know if this is meant to be more than a drafting exercise.
This is incorrect; I'm guessing you're looking at the current draft,
which is NOT the release. The original 0.1.0 release of the
copyleft-next license was back in January of 2013; the most recent
release is 0.3.1, from 2016-04-29.
All the different releases can be seen here:
https://github.com/copyleft-next/copyleft-next/tree/master/Releases
Note that even the oldest release, 0.1.0, does NOT have the
THIS IS A DRAFT. DO NOT USE AS A LICENSE.
header, because it is not a draft, and was indeed intended to be usable
as a license at that point (and I believe at least a few small projects
did so).
_______________________________________________
License-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-review_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
