Pamela Chestek dixit: >would be an enforceable license. Why are you trying to fit it under the
Au contraire, his dual licence isn’t enforceable, unless it allows me to exercise my right (and possibly even duty!) under the LGPL to give a copy to Amazon under LGPL, which they then can use under LGPL. (This includes stripping any additional restrictions.) >umbrella of "open source" too? Yes, please kindly do stop abusing the ressources of this mailing list for your clearly nōn-free ideas. Thanks. bye, //mirabilos -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
