On 3/10/20 11:13 PM, Grahame Grieve wrote:
The question for me is whether there's some useful middle ground. Is
there value in having an ethical use license where the creator gives
up many but not all rights, in a way that respects some core tenets of
the open source movement, and where the ethical restrictions are
careful, and that this place, while not proper open source, is still a
recognisable benefit with a name like Ethical Public Source or something?
Well, yes, that is what Ethical Software Definition is for. Nobody is
saying that there's anything wrong with having such a concept as Ethical
Software. We're saying that there is zero overlap with Open Source.
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
