Hi Florian, The CAL does not share the issue you identify with regard to the AGPL and GPLv1. You said:
With that I do not mean the predominant use of the AGPL as a GPL > variant for open-core business models, but that the AGPL requires to > provide source code access over the network even if the software > itself does not provide a means for accessing it. > This is incorrect. The CAL allows the provision of source code and notices by means of an online repo: " Notices may be provided directly to a Recipient or via an easy-to-find hyperlink to an Internet location also providing Access to Source Code." Thanks, Van
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
