Bruce Perens via License-discuss dixit: >My interpretation is that OSD #3, in the words after the comma, does permit >immutable terms. Attribution is usually a statement of copyright ownership >and qualifies as a term. Rants do not.
>> > What about "If the Work includes >> > a 'NOTICE' text file as part of its distribution, then any Derivative >> > Works that You distribute must include a readable copy of the >> > attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file ..." Don't those The NOTICE file in Apache 2.0 is not restricted to such though ☹ bye, //mirabilos -- 15:41⎜<Lo-lan-do:#fusionforge> Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-) _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
