From: Seth David Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Another argument, which is vaguer and perhaps less important, is that
> communications protocols are not always considered human-readable, and so
> it may be considered bad form to expect human-readable information to be
> inserted into them. (Contrast California Business and Professions Code
> 17538.45(f)(3)(B), which encourages the practice.)
Name-dropper.
They don't encourage it, they note that it may be the case in the future.
Nor do they stipulate that it be primarily human-readable, it might be
formatted such that the sending computer could detect the policy decision
and act accordingly.
Bruce
