Ken Arromdee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[on clause 5 of the GPL]
> The clause following the "Therefore" doesn't logically follow from the
> clauses that it is supposed to logically follow from. Someone who
> copies the code doesn't _automatically_ accept the conditions. If
> they distribute but don't accept the conditions, then they're a
> software pirate and you can sue them... but you can't act as if the
> license has been accepted and can't, for instance, copy the
> modifications.
It sounds to me like you're right. What should GPL v3 say instead?
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/paul/ \ /
/\__/ Paul Crowley Upgrade your legacy NT machines to Linux /~\
