"Jacques Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The above list is not comprehensive, by any means. I begin to think
> that this list might wish to work towards a License HOW-TO, which
> sets out several aspects of the common licenses and how to choose
> your best choice. For maximum interoperability with the GNU project
> and low hacker objection, for example, the GPL is the only choice.
Any license that gives you the option of redistributing under the GPL,
implicitly or explicity, is "GPL-compatible" and grants the same
freedoms. It just doesn't necessarily "forbid anyone to deny you
these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights".
--
__
\/ o\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Got a Linux strategy? \ /
/\__/ Paul Crowley http://www.hedonism.demon.co.uk/paul/ /~\
