At 7:17 PM -0600 7/27/99, Jacques Chester wrote: > >The GPL has had many areas of success. I wonder, out of sheer >curiousity, whether there will emerge a *technical* or *quantitative* >case for any of the licenses. I'm not convinced that it's a technical or quantitative issue. Seems like asking about the medical case for Shoemaker-Levy 9. (Perhaps that was your point.) --- Creed Erickson (mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Deckhand, H.M.S. Beagle
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: gpl backlash? Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: gpl backlash? Derek J. Balling
- Re: gpl backlash? Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: gpl backlash? Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: gpl backlash? Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: gpl backlash? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gpl backlash? Jacques Chester
- Re: gpl backlash? Creed Erickson
- Re: gpl backlash? Wilfredo Sanchez
- Re: gpl backlash? Csaba Szigetvari
- Re: gpl backlash? bruce
- Re: gpl backlash? Martin Konold
- Re: gpl backlash? John Cowan
- Re: gpl backlash? Kyle Rose
- Re: gpl backlash? John Cowan
- Re: gpl backlash? Seth David Schoen
- Re: gpl backlash? Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: gpl backlash? Seth David Schoen

