>Realistically, the major contributors of open source have mostly been hackers. >Would there be a significant reduction in the proliferation and quality of >free software if linux had not gone corporate? Quality : No, other than that which is created by the talent and resources brought to the table by "corporate" types. Proliferation: Absolutely there would be a dramatic difference. Two years ago, to bring a Linux server into an organization that was primarily, say, Windows, was a nightmarish ordeal. Been there, done that. Now, with corporate america "aware" at least of Linux, and its benefits, and it having some associated clout, it is far easier for Joe Hacker to convince his boss that "Hey you should replace that NT server with a Linux box..."
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Signal 11
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Richard Stallman
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Brian Behlendorf
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Derek J. Balling
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Paul Crowley
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Alejandro Forero Cuervo
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. John Cowan
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Signal 11
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Derek Balling
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Ean R . Schuessler
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Signal 11
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Signal 11
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Bojay Iversen
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Bojay Iversen
- Re: Essay RFC delayed. Matt Armstrong

