[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Have you already consulted an attorney who told you that this new license > provision was necessary? I very strongly doubt that it's necessary on top > of the generic "no warranty" claims already present in the GPL. Otherwise, I'd have to agree... the generic disclaimer of warranty would seem to cover this. -- Signal 11, BOFH to the UF list and malign.net "Let's get cracking!" -Dr. Fred
- General Gaming Public License, GGPL Philipp G�hring
- Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL Seth David Schoen
- Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL bruce
- Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL Signal 11
- Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL Mitch Blevins
- Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL Signal 11
- Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL Mitch Blevins
- Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL bruce
- Re: General Gaming Public License, GGPL Mitch Blevins

