On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 08:15:57PM -0700, Mark Wells wrote:
> That's what I see as the major problem with this license: it's unreadable.
> Nobody has to read through the X license more than twice to figure out
> what they're allowed to do with the software. The OSD says that the
> source code has to be distributed in a non-obfuscated form, but what about
> the license? Shouldn't it be non-obfuscated also?
>
Attorneys were involved, yes.
Thanks
Bruce
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C Andrew J Bromage
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C John Cowan
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C Bruce Perens
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2... John Cowan
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version... Ken Arromdee
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version... Justin Wells
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C Mark Wells
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2... David Starner
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version... John Cowan
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2... Bruce Perens
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C bruce
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C Andrew J Bromage
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2... Bruce Perens
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C Andrew J Bromage
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C bruce
- Implementing an encumbered API (was that AT&a... Andrew J Bromage
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C bruce

