Currently, if you do not distribute a GPL binary, you need not distribute
source. RMS was musing at one point about requiring distributed source for
a binary that gets "public performance" (which he can do under basic copyright
law), but this does not exist in the current GPL.
Thanks
Bruce
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption in GP... bruce
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption ... Justin Wells
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exempt... David Starner
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exempt... Derek Balling
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption ... Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exempt... Justin Wells
- Re: Corel: No "internal" ex... Mark Shewmaker
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption ... bruce
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exempt... Derek Balling
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption ... Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exempt... Derek J. Balling
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption ... Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption ... Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exempt... Kristofer
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption ... bruce
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exempt... Derek Balling
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exemption ... Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: Corel: No "internal" exempt... Justin Wells

