Forwarded to opensource.ORG. John Cowan wrote: > > Reluctantly I agree that version 1.2D is Open Source; it is still > biased towards AT&T, but I believe that the clause attempting to > escape from strict-construction rules will be ignored by the court, > so it is nugatory. > > Having read Appendix A, I am not clear whether code under this > license is GPL-compatible or not. I think it is, though. > > -- > John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin
begin:vcard n:Kiger;George tel;fax:972-478-5931 tel;work:972-478-5922 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:OpenSource, Inc.;e-business consultants adr:;;1925 E Beltline Rd, #409;Carrollton;TX;75006; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Director of Business Development x-mozilla-cpt:;-1 fn:George Kiger end:vcard
