> As co-instigator of "Open Source" and the person who originaly announced
> it to the net and wrote most of the Open Source definition, I definitely
... and some other peoples :-)
> have mixed feelings on the subject. In my mind, "Open Source" was meant
> to be a gentle introduction to free software with less rhetoric and more
> demonstration of practical benefit. But the Open Source Definition is
> a definition of Free Software, and was never meant to be anything else.
Yes, as an really open license and not what other companies think about
'Open' (as Sun, ...).
Greetings,
Hartmut
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Robert J Hale
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Tom Hull
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: GNU License for Hardware L. Peter Deutsch
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Arandir
- Re: GNU License for Hardware John Cowan
- OpenIP License Jamil Khaib
- Re: GNU License for Hardware John Cowan
- Re: GNU License for Hardware bruce
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Hartmut Koptein
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Ben_Tilly
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek J. Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Ben_Tilly
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Angelo Schneider
- Re: GNU License for Hardware David Starner
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Bruce Perens

