At 12:07 PM 10/14/99 -0400, John Cowan wrote: > > If he urges one the use of GNU/Linux, but won't urge the use of (the > > theoretical) GNU/Solaris, even though the products are fundamentally > > identical, then that IS hypocrisy. > >Say what? The SunOS kernel isn't free. Why would RMS urge its use? We're not talking about urging its use, we're simply talking about "what would you CALL a hybrid of the SunOS kernel using entirely GNU applications". For RMS's contentions about the name "GNU/Linux" to be true, they also must hold true for "GNU/Solaris". His claim is that Linux is the Kernel, and GNU is the "meat" of the OS, hence the "/" name. His claim also can be extended to GNU/Solaris, if someone were to design such a beast. RMS states that he would not encourage that name, even though he encourages GNU/Linux. THAT is the hypocrisy. D
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Sven LUTHER
- Re: [ppc-mobo] Re: GNU License for Hardware Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Brian J. Fox
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Russell Nelson
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek J. Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware John Cowan
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware John Cowan
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek J. Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek J. Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Richard Stallman
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek J. Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware David Johnson
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Derek Balling
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Alejandro Forero Cuervo
- Re: GNU License for Hardware Kristofer Coward

