---We got almost there, then Linus Torvalds added the missing piece ---and finished the job. So we did succeed, although many others ---helped. This thread seems to be about giving credit to the GNU effort, while the above statement suggest that Linus' contribution was just a snap or some strike of luck. Is it really necessary to play down some one else's contribution to justify the GNU/Linux name? ---GNU as an operating system ---is a success under the the name "Linux". If GNU is an operating system, why do we have to call it GNU/Linux? Why not just GNU? Based on your arguments that would be more appropriate. ---Csaba Szigetv�ri
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Rick Moen
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Pete Schaeffer
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Nick Moffitt
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Andrew J Bromage
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Csaba Szigetvari
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations John Cowan
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Richard Stallman
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Richard Stallman
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Richard Stallman
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Csaba Szigetvari
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Richard Stallman
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Richard Stallman
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations Richard Stallman
- Is this a Kindergarten for engineers? Gilbert Cattoire

