Alex,
I've looked over the SOS license.
In my opinion, it isn't sufficiently different from other licenses already
accepted as Open Source to justify the addition of yet another license.
In addition, I think its "simplicity" isn't real - you aren't an attorney,
and hidden within the license language are some ambiguities and a number of
self-contradictions.
It doesn't seem as if you really _need_ this license. You could use one or
more of the existing ones and have the same effect.
Thanks
Bruce Perens
