Our intent is to let modified ARLOSL (library license) libraries to by
dynamically linked with non-AROSL and/or non-ARLOSL libraries.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Johnson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 6:45 PM
To: Brice, Richard; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alternate Route Open Source Licenses
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Brice, Richard wrote:
> The full text of the Alternate Route licenses can be found at
> http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/eesc/bridge/alternateroute/licenses.htm
> <http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/eesc/bridge/alternateroute/licenses.htm>
One quick comment: in section 5 of the AROSL, at the beginning, it
says
"...under the terms of Sections 4 and 5...". I'm assuming that this
is a typo.
One longer comment: do you intend to allow dynamically linking
modified AROSL
applications to non-AROSL (or compatible) libraries? The GPL, in
some opinions,
is unclear on this point. I would humbly suggest clarifying your
wishes in this
regard, either for or against.
--
Arandir...
_____________________________
http://www.meer.net/~arandir/
