Michael Stutz wrote: > Is it *possible* for a license to be compatible with another? Offhand > I can think of just two possibilities for the GPL: the LGPL, and code > that has no license and is in the public domain. The "new BSD" and the equivalent MIT license are compatible with the GPL; the "old BSD" license with the advertising requirement is not. In general, a license is compatible with the GPL if it imposes the same, or fewer, restrictions than the GPL. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
- Re: License Approval Process Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Chris F Clark
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Alex Nicolaou
- Re: License Approval Process Brice, Richard
- Re: License Approval Process Michael Stutz
- License Compatability Jacques Chester
- RE: License Approval Process Brice, Richard
- RE: License Approval Process Derek J. Balling
- Re: License Approval Process John Cowan
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: License Approval Process Martin Konold
- Re: License Approval Process Jacques Chester
- Re: License Approval Process John Cowan
- Re: License Approval Process Rob Edgeworth
- Re: License Approval Process Seth David Schoen
- Re: License Approval Process jcmason
- Re: License Approval Process Andrew J Bromage
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson

