G'day all. On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 08:07:07PM -0800, David Johnson wrote: > Actually, my dictionary has 17 definitions. Yes. That's why I said "at least three". I think those three definitions are the ones most likely to be confused by the term "free software". It could mean "free" as opposed to "costly" (freeware), "free" as opposed to "encumbered" (MIT/new BSD) or "free" as opposed to "enslaved" (GPL). > Using Richard's definitions, "Free Software" is as unrelated to "Free Speech" > as it is to "Free Beer". "Free speech" is closest to what he is trying to achieve. At the risk of looking like wanting to have the last word, I hereby mention Hitler and thereby close this thread before the inevitable flamefest from my little soapbox speech gets out of control. Back to the OSI certification process discussion... Cheers, Andrew Bromage
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: License Approval Process Martin Konold
- Re: License Approval Process Jacques Chester
- Re: License Approval Process John Cowan
- Re: License Approval Process Rob Edgeworth
- Re: License Approval Process Seth David Schoen
- Re: License Approval Process jcmason
- Re: License Approval Process Andrew J Bromage
- Re: License Approval Process David Johnson
- Re: License Approval Process Andrew J Bromage
- Re: License Approval Process Alex Nicolaou
- Re: License Approval Process Geoff Eldridge
- RE: License Approval Process Dennis E. Hamilton
- Re: License Approval Process John Cowan
- RE: License Approval Process Brice, Richard
- RE: License Approval Process Dave Stanley
- Re: License Approval Process lrosen
- Re: License Approval Process Rick Moen
- Re: License Approval Process Dave Stanley

