On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. wrote: > In other words, the irony of open source is that it is easier to prove > copyright infringement than it would be if the software were proprietary or > closed-source. In my particular case, I should have no problems. However, your irony is interesting. Releasing source code under a no-modify license may be better IP protection than keeping it 100% closed. -- Arandir... _____________________________ http://www.meer.net/~arandir/
- Hypothetical question... David Johnson
- RE: Hypothetical question... Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Hypothetical question... Gregory Martin Pfeil
- RE: Hypothetical question... David Johnson
- RE: Hypothetical question... Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.

