According to John Cowan:
> Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > In other words, the license adheres to the code, not the author.
>
> A license that isn't a contract (a bare permission) can be freely
> revoked by the licensor, as in an invitation to enter onto land: if
> the landowner changes his mind, the licensee instantly becomes a
> trespasser.
*shock* *dismay*
I never thought I'd say this, but: 'Only UCITA can save us now.'
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL David Johnson
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Mark Wielaard
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL W . Yip
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL W . Yip
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Richard Watts
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Chip Salzenberg
- RE: Wired Article -- Nullifying a GPL? Dennis E. Hamilton
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL John Cowan
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Ken Arromdee
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Nils Lohner
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Chip Salzenberg
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Richard Watts
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL John Cowan
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Justin Wells
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL John Cowan
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL Richard Watts
- Re: Wired Article on the GPL John Cowan

