begin Derek J. Balling quotation:
> It is obvious now, that any product using the GPL has opened its
> owner up to liability in the case you've described, and I don't see
> the GPL actually getting changed in this regard (it seems it would go
> against RMS's moral code for it, and I can acknowledge that side of
> the argument).
>
> No clear-cut answers here, but I think the problem is actually much
> more insidious than you realized. :)
GPL clauses 11 & 12 ("NO WARRANTY") attempt to avert this problem.
Nothing prevents some court from imputing liability despite that --
but one cannot absolutely prevent courts from doing perverse things,
only discourage it.
--
Cheers, "Open your present...."
Rick Moen "No, you open your present...."
rick (at) linuxmafia.com Kaczinski Christmas.
-- Unabomber Haiku Contest, CyberLaw mailing list
- prohibiting use that would result in death or personal i... Justin Wells
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... David Johnson
- RE: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... SamBC
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Derek J. Balling
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Rick Moen
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Derek J. Balling
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Seth David Schoen
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Rick Moen
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Derek J. Balling
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Rick Moen
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Rick Moen
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Justin Wells
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... David Johnson
- Re: prohibiting use that would result in death or p... Derek J. Balling

