On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Matthew C. Weigel wrote: > But there is, potentially, a difference -- someone can take you to court > over whether your fee was 'reasonable.' The GPL has no such limits: The clause in question does not state that Lucent gets to decide what is "reasonable". For all intents and purposes, if a buyer and a sell agree on a price, it is reasonable. As such, it is a meaningless adjective. On the other hand, to be nit-picky about it, the GPL only allows you to charge for transferring a copy, or for supplying a warranty. I can't sell the copy itself, nor can I charge for the media. -- David Johnson _________________________ <http://www.usermode.org>
- RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments John Cowan
- RE: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Richard Stallman
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson
- RE: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comment... Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- RE: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments SamBC
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Matthew Weigel
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Matthew Weigel
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Matthew C. Weigel
- RE: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson

