I Agree. Rod > -----Original Message----- > From: SamBC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 9:21 AM > To: License Discussion (opensource) > Subject: RE: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > I think someone suggested dropping the word "reasonable." I think > > that is a > > good idea. RMS seems to think so too. > > > True, but RMS is not a god, and we are debating wether the license is Open > Source, not Free Software. > > The word is important, in certain ways, and should be left in with the > addition of a definition, or it should be removed if the authors will not > accept this > > > SamBC > >
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Matthew Weigel
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Matthew C. Weigel
- RE: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Mark Wells
- RE: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments SamBC
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments John Cowan
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments John Cowan
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson
- Re: RMS on Plan 9 license, with my comments David Johnson

