Terry Hancock wrote:

> Should a Free interpreter intended to be able to
> run proprietary programs be covered under the
> GPL or the LGPL?

Well, first of all, anything licensed under the LGPL is effectively
licensed under the GPL too, because anyone can take a copy and convert
it to the GPL.

That said, most such interpreters are licensed under the GPL,
such as Perl.
 
-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

Reply via email to