For the record, that would be the Free Software _Foundation_, wouldn't it? He could come up with his own ideas and call his new organization the Free Software Movement with (I would expect) very little legal difficulty (aside from potential public backlash from potential confusion with the FSF). D At 12:05 AM -0600 8/28/00, Richard Stallman wrote: >The Free Software Movement has its goals, its philosophy, and its >definition of free software. You probably have your own goals and >philosophy, and if you want to have a different idea of what free >software means, you can do that too. But then it isn't the Free >Software Movement.
- Re: Plan 9 license John Cowan
- Re: Plan 9 license Rick Moen
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- RE: Plan 9 license Vinodh Kumar S
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Martin Konold
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license Derek J. Balling
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license Mark Shewmaker
- Re: Plan 9 license Brian Behlendorf
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license Derek J. Balling
- Re: Plan 9 license Derek J. Balling
- Re: Plan 9 license Chris Sloan
- Re: Plan 9 license kmself

