My understanding was that a legal entity can make private
modifications to GPL software and is allowed to keep those
modifications private,
That is our interpretation. In other words, using a copy
within the company is not distribution to others.
So, since a corporation is allowed to make private changes, I don't
see why they could not instruct their employees to keep those changes
private to the company.
I believe that they can.
- Re: Plan 9 license Brian Behlendorf
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license Derek J. Balling
- Re: Plan 9 license Derek J. Balling
- Re: Plan 9 license Chris Sloan
- Re: Plan 9 license kmself
- RE: Plan 9 license Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Chris Sloan
- RE: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- RE: Plan 9 license Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license Angelo Schneider
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- RE: Plan 9 license Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Plan 9 license Rick Moen
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Tom Hull
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman

