My understanding was that a legal entity can make private modifications to GPL software and is allowed to keep those modifications private, That is our interpretation. In other words, using a copy within the company is not distribution to others. So, since a corporation is allowed to make private changes, I don't see why they could not instruct their employees to keep those changes private to the company. I believe that they can.
- Re: Plan 9 license Brian Behlendorf
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license Derek J. Balling
- Re: Plan 9 license Derek J. Balling
- Re: Plan 9 license Chris Sloan
- Re: Plan 9 license kmself
- RE: Plan 9 license Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Chris Sloan
- RE: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- RE: Plan 9 license Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license Angelo Schneider
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- RE: Plan 9 license Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Plan 9 license Rick Moen
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman
- Re: Plan 9 license David Johnson
- Re: Plan 9 license Tom Hull
- Re: Plan 9 license Richard Stallman