on Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:23:19PM +0100, Sven Dehmlow privat ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi,
> Linux 1.0 is under GPL, of course. But is Linux 0.1 is under Linus' "own"
> license. Is Linux 0.97 under GPL?
You can find historic versions of the Linux_ kernel at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic/
The archive may be incomplete -- I see an 0.99.x and 0.96[abc]. No
0.97. The 0.96 tarball contains no readily apparent COPYING file or
licensing notice, other than Linus's copyright. It's possible (though I
don't know for certain) that the code has be retroactively included in
the GPL relicensing.
Why specifically 0.97?
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
Evangelist, Opensales, Inc. http://www.opensales.org
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
PGP signature
