Bryan George wrote: > > - If not, would it be difficult to surgically alter the LGPL to remove > > the OMAREC and maintain GPL compatibility? > > > > No. All you have to do is retain section 3. > > Sounds like it may be the way to go. Unfortunately, the very first line of the LGPL prevents this solution: variants of the LGPL may not be created. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
- Re: LGPL clarification Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: LGPL clarification Mark Wielaard
- Re: LGPL clarification kmself
- Re: LGPL clarification Rick Moen
- Re: LGPL clarification Frank Hecker
- Re: LGPL clarification Bryan George
- Re: LGPL clarification Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: LGPL clarification Ken Arromdee
- Re: LGPL clarification Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: LGPL clarification David Johnson
- Re: LGPL clarification John Cowan
- Re: LGPL clarification Bryan George
- Re: LGPL clarification Bryan George
- Re: LGPL clarification Bryan George
- Re: LGPL clarification John Cowan
- Re: LGPL clarification Frank Hecker
- Re: LGPL clarification Bryan George
- RE: LGPL clarification Dave J Woolley
- Re: LGPL clarification Ken Arromdee
- Re: LGPL clarification Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: LGPL clarification Bryan George

