begin Manfred Schmid quotation: > > However, OSD criteria number 3 says that you must permit > > modifications and derived works. If the IPL forbids people from > > removing the licensing code, then it violates OSD criteria number > > 3. > > Taken directly from http://www.opensource.org/osd.html > > "3. Derived Works > > The license must allow modifications and derived works, and must allow > them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the > original software. (rationale)" The abovementioned "terms" must also satisfy OSD #1. -- You are not entitled to your opinions. 01234567 <- The amazing indent-o-meter! ^ Matt McIrvin: the Nikola Tesla of tab damage.
- Re: IPL as a burden Mark Koek
- Re: IPL as a burden David Johnson
- Re: IPL as a burden Manfred Schmid
- Re: IPL as a burden Brian DeSpain
- Re: IPL as a burden Manfred Schmid
- Re: IPL as a burden Mark Hatch
- Re: IPL as a burden Gregor Hoffleit
- Re: IPL as a burden Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: IPL as a burden Frank LaMonica
- Re: IPL as a burden Manfred Schmid
- Re: IPL as a burden Nick Moffitt
- Re: IPL as a burden Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: IPL as a burden Andrew J Bromage
- RE: IPL as a burden Lawrence E. Rosen
- Re: IPL as a burden Andrew J Bromage
- Re: IPL as a burden Frank LaMonica
- Re: IPL as a burden Andrew J Bromage
- Re: IPL as a burden Manfred Schmid
- Re: IPL as a burden Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: IPL as a burden Russell Nelson
- Re: IPL as a burden kmself

