G'day all. On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:17:41AM -0800, Frank LaMonica wrote: > I like the terminology you used: "source included software (SIS)". SIS would > be much better than a closed source, proprietary alternative, but I don't see > any incentive for open source programmers to contribute to such a program. As I understand it, interDAT will be offering them money. Cheers, Andrew Bromage
- Re: IPL as a burden Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: IPL as a burden Mark Koek
- Re: IPL as a burden Ralf Schwoebel
- Re: IPL as a burden SamBC
- Re: IPL as a burden Frank LaMonica
- Re: IPL as a burden Gregor Hoffleit
- Re: IPL as a burden kmself
- Re: IPL as a burden Forrest J. Cavalier III
- Re: IPL as a burden Mark Koek
- RE: IPL as a burden Ben Tilly
- Re: IPL as a burden Andrew J Bromage
- Re: IPL as a burden Frank LaMonica
- Re: IPL as a burden Andrew J Bromage
- Re: IPL as a burden Andrew J Bromage
- Re: IPL as a burden SamBC
- Re: IPL as a burden Angelo Schneider
- Re: IPL as a burden John Cowan
- Re: IPL as a burden Brian DeSpain
- RE: IPL as a burden Lou Grinzo
- Re: IPL as a burden John Cowan
- Re: IPL as a burden kmself

