on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:30:15AM -0800, Brian Behlendorf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Sorry if this seems pedantic...
Not at all, quite appreciated. I have trouble keeping up with
everything and appreciate the watchful eye.
Thanks.
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > - Convergence. Despite some degree of internal conflict, the final
> > nail was really the result of independent external resolution of
> > many of the issues we had sought to address. As of the last meeting
> > (O'Reilly Conference, July, 2000), the landscape was clearly
> > shifting to focus on what seemed to be three principle licensing
> > models:
> >
> > - GNU GPL/LGPL: A primary license for HP's EZSpeak (?) project,
>
> e-speak. Also OpenOffice.
>
> > adopted as part of multi-licensing models by Sun, Mozilla, and
> > others.
> >
> > - Mozilla Public License: With very minor wording changes, adopted
> > by Sun as the SISSL.
>
> Uh, no. Adopted by Sun for the "SPL", under which they've released
> NetBeans. The SISSL is much different, much shorter, more in spirit with
> the BSD licenses than the other two.
>
> > - BSD/MIT style: Apple's Darwin code is derived from BSD sources,
> > and Apple appears more comfortable with the BSD licensing model
> > than GPL. Apple's own licensing has changed within the past
> > month, I still need to review the changes.
>
> Yes, but to be clear, Apple's APSL is much different than the BSD license.
>
> Brian
>
>
>
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
PGP signature
