On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Samuel Reynolds wrote: > The copyright owner can license the code under any terms he likes, > or none at all. > He can license the code under different terms to different people. > He can license the code under different terms to the same people at > different times. Or, as in the case with GPL, some of the code is under someone else's copyright, to which the original author as a license via the GPL. Ssh is a good example of GPL'd code becoming less free. OpenSSH is a good example of what happens with the GPL'd version :) -- Matthew Weigel Research Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Ralph Bloemers
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Brian DeSpain
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Samuel Reynolds
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed David Johnson
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Eric Jacobs
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Ben Tilly
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Dave J Woolley
- Re: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Chris Sloan
- RE: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Lawrence E. Rosen
- RE: Converting/Splitting Code - Open to Closed Dave J Woolley

