"Ryan S. Dancey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If a court found that the first and third results Mr. Woolley enumerated > were not derivative works (and thus could ignore the terms of the LGPL or > the GPL for non-free code), I suspect that a case could be made to the FSF > for abandoning the use of the LGPL. The FSF is already abandoning the LGPL in any case. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html Ian
- RE: What is Copyleft? Dave J Woolley
- Re: What is Copyleft? Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: What is Copyleft? Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: What is Copyleft? Dave J Woolley
- Re: What is Copyleft? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: What is Copyleft? Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: What is Copyleft? Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: What is Copyleft? Dave J Woolley
- RE: What is Copyleft? Dave J Woolley
- Re: What is Copyleft? Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: What is Copyleft? Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: What is Copyleft? David Johnson
- RE: What is Copyleft? Fred Patrick
- Re: What is Copyleft? David Johnson
- RE: What is Copyleft? Lawrence E. Rosen
- RE: What is Copyleft? Fred Patrick
- Re: What is Copyleft? David Johnson
- RE: What is Copyleft? Dave J Woolley