On Tuesday March 13 2001 12:35 am, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. wrote: > Whether the library is intended to be shared should be readily resolved if > its distributed under the GNU GPL or LGPL, so there is no issue there, and > section 117(a)(1) should apply. This would seem to presuppose that the GPL disallows dynamic linkage :-) It's taking a huge leap of faith that to argue since RMS intends one thing, that all authors of GPL works intend the same thing. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org
- Linking restrictions and shared libraries Dr. David Gilbert
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared libraries John Cowan
- RE: Linking restrictions and shared libraries Dave J Woolley
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared libraries Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared libraries Dr. David Gilbert
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared librar... Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared libraries kmself
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared libraries Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared librar... David Johnson
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared libraries David Johnson
- RE: Linking restrictions and shared libraries Carter Bullard
- Re: Linking restrictions and shared librar... David Johnson

