On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>
> There are IP lawyers I know who will argue up and down that software
> implemented to a specification is a derivative work of that spec, so that
> spec's copyright terms need to be obeyed (which is why I said both the
> spec and the code were under my "call it something else if you're not
> compatible" license) when creating derivative works.
I hope this is not the case. I wouldn't like Microsoft to have the ability
to suppress WINE because it uses the Windows API.
--
***** Phil Hunt *****
"An unforseen issue has arisen with your computer. Don't worry your silly
little head about what has gone wrong; here's a pretty animation of a
paperclip to look at instead."
-- Windows2007 error message
- namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? home
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? phil hunt
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? phil hunt
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OS... Lawrence E. Rosen
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Eric Jacobs
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave J Woolley
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? phil hunt
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OS... Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Lawrence E. Rosen
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave J Woolley
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Eric Jacobs

