on Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:22:08AM -0700, Lawrence E. Rosen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> The Common Public License is the same as the IBM Public License with the
> name "IBM" removed. IBM submitted that license directly to OSI for approval
> because it helped solve a problem that people were having -- specifically,
> the ability to use the IBM Public License without having to apply for
> modification merely to replace IBM's name with the name of the new licensor.
> We encourage other licensors to submit such "template" licenses wherever
> possible.
>
> /Larry Rosen
Kudos to IBM.
Very strong kudos.
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
PGP signature
