Michael,

The clause only says which law applies, it doesn't limit where cases can be
held.  It is not uncommon for courts in , say California, to decide a case
under New York law.  Lastly, the enforceability of such governing law
provisions depends upon the Choice of Law rules of the particular
jurisdiction where litigation is filed.  Also, the enforceability of the
other provisions within the CPL depends upon contract law, which differs
significantly from state to state.  Therefore, there may have been specific
reasons why New York law was chosen over other states.

Regards,
--Dan

Dan Ravicher
Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison, LLP
1633 Broadway, 47th Fl.
NY, NY 10019
p. 212.315.8032
f. 212.586.7878
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.brobeck.com/


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Cochran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Common Public License




We have noticed that the common public license states:
   "This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of New York
   and the intellectual property laws of the United States of America.
   No party to this Agreement will bring a legal action under this
   Agreement more than one year after the cause of action arose. Each
   party waives its rights to a jury trial in any resulting
   litigation."

What if your company is not based in the State of New York? Maybe it
should say "of the state of residence" or something

Mike Cochran


=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain 
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com



Reply via email to