On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, David Johnson wrote: > Back when I joined this list, it was my impression that it was only > for unofficial public discussion of licenses, and *not* meant to be > any part of an approval process. My assumption at that time, which > still holds, is that the OSI board has their own discussions during > the approval phase. According to the website, it is to "review" submitted licenses. Regardless, one would think that making known whether a license had made it or not would be reasonable, once a decision had been made. How else are they accountable to the community they purport to represent, than by making their actions known? -- Matthew Weigel Research Systems Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] ne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- approved licenses web page not being updated David Wallace Croft
- Re: approved licenses web page not being updat... Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
- Re: approved licenses web page not being updat... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: approved licenses web page not being updat... Russell Nelson
- Re: approved licenses web page not being updat... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: approved licenses web page not being u... Russell Nelson
- Re: approved licenses web page not being updat... David Johnson
- Re: approved licenses web page not being u... Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: approved licenses web page not being u... Joseph M. Reagle Jr.
- RE: approved licenses web page not being updat... SamBC
- Re: approved licenses web page not being updat... Rick Moen
- Re: approved licenses web page not being u... Karsten M. Self
- RE: approved licenses web page not being u... SamBC
- Re: approved licenses web page not being u... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: approved licenses web page not being u... Russell Nelson

